Sustainable Practices and Environmental Audits

This summer we plan to carry out an environmental audit and to assess our carbon footprint.  We don’t expect this to be a straightforward business as most of the parameters are designed with buildings in mind, not tents.  We are very fortunate to be offered some expertise from one of our supporters who works at an environmental consultancy which will be a great help.

When we started Green and Away every aspect of the project was considered from a sustainable angle, from the food, to the toilets, to heating the showers.  The criterea has always been that we make the least environmental impact we possibly could.  However if you are a prospective organiser looking for a venue, the guidelines for choosing an eco-conference centre ask, amongst other things, to check if grey water is being used to flush toilets.  We don’t use grey water for toilets as we have composting toilets not flush ones.  This means our water usage is much lower but we are also not causing energy use outside

A G&A composting toilet

our conference centre, normally used in disposing of the sewage, and we should have plus marks for producing a compost that can fertilise trees therefore giving a net gain!  We don’t use disposable plates, cups and cutlery, we use second hand ones we have bought from a car boot sale thereby lengthening the life of the utensiles and reducing the embodied energy per item per year of use.  We wash everything by hand so no electricity is used and we heat the water with solar power when the sun shines or wood if it doesn’t – both carbon neutral systems.  We do encourage the use of public transport although country buses are notoriously few and far between.  Some conference organisers arrange a mini bus pick up from the station which enables more people to use public transport.

The problem with standards is that they have to have arbitary fixed boundaries around the business.  This means that one is not really taking in the cradle to grave impacts of each system in use.  For example the embodied energy used in solar panels along with the implications of mining precious minerals could mean that the units are very carbon hungry in their manufacture but very sustainable in producing electricity.  So how easy it is to compare solar electricity with a coal-fired power station electricity?

Some years ago, one of the executives of an environmental organisation was taken to task for driving a ‘gas guzzling volvo’ as this did not seem to fit with the image of sustainability he was trying to portray.  His answer was that his volvo was over 15 years old and had at least another 10 years of life left in it.  If it is run to the end of its life and one takes the embodied energy of manufacture plus fuel used into account, a volvo looks quite sustainable.  What is not sustainable is buying a new car every two years and scrapping them when they are only four years old for some relatively minor damage.  It is quite a shock walking round a car reclamation pound and seeing how many quite new vehicles are being broken up because they have a pranged wing.

Solar Hot Water heater

Our culture of replacement over repair and trading up for the next new model is making far more demands on the earth’s resources than is sustainable.  We really need to lift our viewpoint from what is immediately in front of us and see our activities in the context of the wider world view.  Not everything that looks green is green and not everything that looks consumerist is a problem. Ultimately we need to rethink how and what we use, how we can extend the life of useful things by repairing them.

A brand new Eco-conference centre filled with sustainable gadgets may look attractively green but how can that compare with Green and Away’s recycled, repaired, low tech, low impact approach?  We will have to see what our carbon footprint shows us and if this is a meaningful tool for measuring sustainability.

 

Keeping the Environmental Flag Flying

Last week Friends of the Earth held a big party to celebrate 40 years of activism for the environmental cause.  For a relatively small organization, Friends of the Earth has an impressive legacy. Through their more than 40-year history, they have provided crucial leadership in fights resulting in landmark environmental laws, precedent-setting legal victories and the exposure of political malfeasance and corporate greed. FOE was one of the earliest organisations to champion the environmental cause, and inspired people around the world to set up their own environmental organisations.  In the early days their staff and supporters were radical and unsual people who were brave enough to stand up for the Earth and against those doing their best to destroy it.  Back then there were few people who believed there was a problem and refused to acknowledge one when presented with the facts.  Now FOE is an international organisation and only a minority of self-interested people dispute the justice of their campaigns.

Another organisation which was right at the forefront of the environmental movement, in fact even before FOE, is Resurgence.  This organisation started as a magazine back in 1966 and grew out of the peace and anti-nuclear movement.  It took on its current guise  in 1973 when Satish Kumar took over as editor.  He has guided it over the years to become “ — a magazine for people who care about the environment, enjoy reading, relish new ideas and are looking for inspiration on sustainable living. ‘  Readers of Resurgence magazine have been people who care passionately about the earth and what happens to it and all its inhabitants. Next year will be the 50th anniversary of Resurgence Magazine.

Both organisations have, in their own small or not so small, ways made a huge difference to the way people think and to the acceptance that we have to take responsibility for what we do on and with the Earth.  Although governments are not doing everything needed to protect the environment and the earth, they are aware that this is one of them most important issues that face us today, partly because of activities by these organisations.  The environmental movement is a force for change and it is happening.

Green and Away has been one of the many other voices for change.  For 21 years we have been hosting conferences and inspiring people to take more notice of the environment and to do something about it.  FOE campaigns, Resurgence informs and Green and Away leads by example.  We have been supporting green and environmental organisations all of our existence, have hosted Resurgence for the last fourteen years and FOE on five occasions.  It is vital for people to meet and come together in order to make things happen.  What better place to be pushing forward the green agenda than at the ultimate environmentally sustainable conference centre?

The environmental movement has a lot to celebrate but we are all to aware that there is still so much to do.  Convincing people that there is a problem was a huge task and one that has mostly been achieved.  Now the challenge is to find another way to live that is more sustainable as well as a better quality of life so that people will happily change.  This new way will not be rooted in money and possessions but in community and relationship.  It is only when we care and our hearts are engaged with each other and the earth that we are happy to live a different and sustainable life. The rewards for living this way cannot be measured in monitory terms like GDP, but they could be measured in well being or Gross National Happiness as they do in Bhutan.  Every summer those of us who live and work at Green and Away find that we are living this way and we aim to enable others to do the same.

The Crew 2011